Calibration Workspace

Compare and adjust ratings side-by-side · synced live

Updated 8:45:05 PM

Employees

2

High Performers

0%

High Flight Risk

1

Succession Ready

0

Filter by 9-box:
Employee9-Box PlacementPerformancePotentialFlight RiskSuccessionTalent Risk

Eris Esparza

Project Team Lead

3.5
3.3
Moderate

A

a

1.8
2.0
Low

Click any rating cell to edit inline · Changes save immediately

Rating Distribution vs Benchmarks

5 skews detected

Performance Distribution

SignificantlyAchieves0%25%50%75%100%
Barely Meets:50% (vs 15% norm)
Consistently Achieves:50% (vs 60% norm)
Significantly Achieves:0% (vs 25% norm)

Potential Distribution

LowMidHigh0%25%50%75%100%
Low:50% (vs 20% norm)
Mid:50% (vs 55% norm)
High:0% (vs 25% norm)

Talent Risk Distribution

LowModerateHigh0%25%50%75%100%
Low:50% (vs 60% norm)
Moderate:50% (vs 30% norm)
High:0% (vs 10% norm)
Benchmark (norm)
Your Team
· Bars over benchmark = potential leniency · Under = potential severity bias